HOW TO GET SOMETHING FROM NOTHING JUST BY ALTERING OUR MODE OF PERCEPTION
In the optical illusion above.. two entirely different images.. the face of a beautiful woman.. and an old hag.. occupy the same space. This picture draws our attention to how much the mind can project what it has learned to see.. and that it can also learn to see differently.. on the basis of a simple change in our understanding.
Much of what we term reality.. are perceptions.. like.. the earth is static and does not move under our feet... or the earth is flat.. with the sun traveling round it.. The most convincing illusion is the belief that the universe is material.. this is just as much of a perception as a flat earth.
However physics now tells us that most of what exists is just empty space.. and the ammount of matter that makes up the material world is so small that it is not even worth mentioning....
As for evidence.. Bells Theorem of Entanglement.... is the best evidence.. of the existance of a Primary Field at present. Since the Primary Field exists outside of space-time.. it would allow information to travel in an instant.. and the information would not be subject to the speed restrictions placed on it by relativity.
Physics seems to have reached the conclusion that there is no such thing as – NOTHINGNESS.
In Quantum physics.. there is the concept of the Vacuum.. out of which virtual particles arise out of NOTHINGNNESS.. If this concept were extended throughout the multi-verse.. and renamed a FIELD RATHER than a vacuum.. and IF it was recognized that EVERYTHING that existed was simply an activity in this Field.. then we would arrive at a UNIFICATION which we might call.. A Primary Field Theory.
The idea of parallel universes also points to the complete absence of space-time between the universes that make up the multi-verse.. this is because the energy between the universes is dormant.. so it can not be detected.
Then there are the mysterious infinities.. that get ignored.. in theoretical physics.. because they don’t know how to fit them into existing theories.
If it is true that energy is nether created nor destroyed.. it stands to reason that energy exists out-side of time.. and has no beginning or end.. it is ETERNAL AND INFINITE. It can be dormant or active.. but it never gets created.. and it never gets destroyed.. IT just constantly changes. My Primary Field Theory States that EVERYTHING is ENERGY. For most part.. the field consists of dormant energy.. while the universes that come and go in it are simply.. pockets of activity.
A primary Field could also explain the enigma of dark energy and matter.. but I can’t say I have looked into that enough yet.. BUT if our universe is an activity occurring in a Primary Field.. the universe could be expanding into it because.. like gravity.. it offers the path of least resistance.. and this would explain the expansion.. rather like water running down hill.. so no need of any dark material to cause the expanse.
The Casimir force is widely cited as evidence that underlying the universe there must be a sea of real zero-point energy. This argument follows from Casimir's analysis and prediction. It is not necessarily true, however. It is perfectly possible to explain the Casimir effect by taking into account the quantum-induced motions of atoms in each plate and examining the retarded potential interactions of atoms in one plate with those in the other.
There is also plenty of evidence of a Primary Field in philosophical writings.. going right back to Taoism.. Buddhism.. and Monism.. the philosophical writings of many of the great theoretical physicists also support the concept of there being an under-lying ONENESS.
SOME QUOTES THAT SUPPORT A PRIMARY FIELD THEORY
"Mind and intelligence are woven into the fabric of our universe in a way that altogether surpasses our understanding. The universe shows evidence of the operations of mind on three levels. The first level is the level of elementary physical processes in quantum mechanics. Matter in quantum mechanics is constantly making choices between alternative possibilities according to probabilistic laws. The second level at which we detect the operations of mind is the level of direct human experience. It is reasonable to believe in the existence of a third level of mind, a mental component of the universe. If we believe in this mental component and call it God, then we can say that we are small pieces of God's mental apparatus" - Freeman Dyson
Freeman Dyson was a theoretical physicist and mathematician, famous for his work in quantum electrodynamics, solid-state physics, astronomy and nuclear engineering
This quote is Einstein speaking to Schwinger.. (one of the founders of quantum field theory).. about what he saw as a problem of having six quantum fields…. instead of just one........
“This is indeed a beautiful theory, but it seems there are six separate fields – four force fields and two matter fields. As you know, my hope was to find a single field that comprises all forces and matter. This theory of yours does not meet that objective.”
There is one quote I have found from Einstein which is more or less a contemplative mental thought about the notion of infinite spaces, which doesn't directly relate to my own approach of describing a shape to all possible spaces, but it does at least open up the subject of an infinite number of spaces to speculation. And it also shows the open minded nature of Einstein's thoughts about empty space, which some have thought were closed.
(individual fields of consxiousness)
Before one has become aware of this complication, space appears as an unbounded medium or container in which material objects swim around. But it must be remembered that there is an infinite number of spaces, which are in motion with respect to each other.
The concept of space as something existing objectively and independent of things belongs to pre-scientific thought, but not so the idea of the existence of an infinite number of spaces in motion relatively to each other. This latter idea is indeed unavoidable, but is far from having played a considerable role even in scientific thought.
I can testify that Einstein's speculations revealed here concerning infinite spaces in motion do at least carry us in the right direction, in how they suggest space might have an unseen and possibly infinite content. Most noteworthy, similar ideas came from the work of David Bohm, who introduced the idea of an implicate order. Implicate order for Bohm was a way of acknowledging that quantum mechanics reveals that space contains a hidden order. However, that order is much more visible than Bohm ever realized. There is the order of groups and grouping that we are accustomed to acknowledging, but there also is an order of balance and symmetry which smoothes out the pronounced nature of grouping, until in extreme, the symmetry of balance seems to be a nothingness.
...you need infinite amounts of energy to accelerate infinite mass past the speed of light mark! (and as far as I know we have yet to find an infinite source of energy.
“Since there exist in this four dimensional structure [space-time] no longer any sections which represent "now" objectively, the concepts of happening and becoming are indeed not completely suspended, but yet complicated. It appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence, instead of, as hitherto, the evolution of a three dimensional existence.”
, "...for us physicists believe the separation between past, present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one."
Even before writing that book, Hawking began to reveal his membership in the ranks of the loophole seekers. In 1983 Stephen Hawking and James Hartle advanced the notion that since we cannot determine conditions in the universe before 10-43(or,00000000000000000000000000000000000000001) after its origin, perhaps some unknown phenomenon in that speck of time might have disturbed the governance of general relativity. If so, space, time, matter, and energy might not have originated from a true singularity (beginning from an infinitely small volume). They went on to propose that just as the behavior of a hydrogen atom can be described by a quantum mechanical wave function, so might the behavior of the universe. If that is the case, they claimed, the universe could have just popped into existence out of absolutely nothing at what most would call the beginning of time.
Even if Hawking's hypothesis were true, there would still be no escaping the need for a Creator-God. As Heinz Pagels, a theoretical physicist explains: This unthinkable void converts itself into the plenum of existence - a necessary consequence of physical laws. Where are these laws written into that void? What "tells" the void that it is pregnant with a possible universe? It would seem that even the void is subject to law, a logic that exists prior to space and time.